Thursday, May 28, 2015
New Mayor
Last Tuesday evening we had the pleasure of welcoming our new Mayor to Council by having him sworn in during our scheduled Council meeting. The chamber was standing room only, and there was a sense of excitement in the air. Justice of the Peace Mary Tom Curnutt performed the oath of office, and a new chapter was started for Arlington, Texas. I might add that all the incumbent Council members were re-elected and sworn in by the City Secretary.
As for me, I am looking forward to working with Jeff, and I think that a new energy will add some vitality to Council. Sometimes we need a different perspective and I hope that Jeff will offer his insights and experiences in the business and engineering areas where he has been successful.
I think that Jeff and I are very like minded, in that we want to accomplish the same goals for the City. At a lunch we had last week I outlined my objectives, and he was on board. I look forward to his support on establishing a state of the art senior center in Arlington. I am also looking forward to seeing what can be done about establishing senior living facilities in north Arlington where apartments are currently setting. It is our combined belief that we owe a debt to our seniors, and that there is a void in the services that we currently provide. So I am excited, and now that we are done with all the ceremony and celebration I'm looking forward to getting back to the job of building a better Arlington.
Monday, May 25, 2015
Memorial Day
Memorial Day is very special to me. I am a Veteran, so was my dad and my son, and there is a day in November set aside for saying thank you for our service. But Memorial Day has a special reverence to it because it remembers those who gave the ultimate sacrifice, to preserve our way of life. There is a saying, “they gave away all of their tomorrows so that we could enjoy today.” That is so humbling to me that it shakes my core.
This weekend I was free to attend the church of my belief. I am free to speak my mind on any subject without the threat of imprisonment. I am free to move about this great country without restriction. And lastly I am free to pursue life, liberty and happiness, as long as I conform to the laws of this nation. For some of you it may not sound like much, but imagine not having just one of those freedoms, much less having all of them removed. That is why it is so important to take the time to remember our fallen.
When I think of all of my friends that went to Vietnam and didn’t return and some casualty’s names aren’t even on that wall, I stop and think. To this day, emotion overwhelms me when I stand at that wall. I find it interesting that there is only one memorial in Washington D.C. That would be Arlington Memorial Cemetery, all the rest are monuments. Even the word is preserved for something very special. If you have ever been to the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier, you will understand the word Memorial. The Old Guard has stood watch over the Tomb continuously since 1948, continuously! The west side of the Tomb reads, “HERE RESTS IN HONORED GLORY AN AMERICAN SOLDIER KNOWN BUT TO GOD”.
America remains that beacon on the
hill today, because of the sacrifice honored on this day, Memorial Day. Please take the time to reflect on this gift,
and remember.
Wednesday, May 20, 2015
Vote Official
Yesterday was an interesting day for the city of
Arlington. We started out the afternoon
with an Arlington Tomorrow Foundation meeting.
Now this meeting had two elements that I thought were of merit. The first was $4.0 Million to be granted to
the new library from the fund. The
remaining amount is to be issued in certificates of obligation. This is an example of a new library and
Council Chamber that is to be constructed without the use of citizen tax
revenue. That’s correct, there isn’t a
burden to the taxpayer for these new structures. The second item of interest is the “Dream”
sign that is to be installed near the Levitt Pavilion. Although this expenditure passed, I simply
couldn’t bring myself to vote for it.
The reason being is simply that I don’t think that it was a good idea to
arbitrarily construct something of this nature.
In short I think it will look “cheesy”.
Now I have to print a disclaimer and state for the record that I am no
authority on the arts. That being said I
simply could support something of this nature.
Last night the vote was canvassed and became official. Mayor Cluck pounded the gavel for the last
time. It was a very emotional event for
the Mayor. You can either love the Mayor
or not, but you can’t deny the fact that he has dedicated the last sixteen
years of his life in the service of our city.
During that time Arlington has evolved into the entertainment capital of
the Metroplex. We, as a city, have
thrived in a time where other cities have floundered, through an economic
downturn. Arlington has more projects
completed and underway than any other city in north Texas. Mayor Cluck has played a large part in making
those project become reality. He can be
proud of the work that he has done. So
we said goodbye to him at a reception last evening. Where one door closes another door opens and
new opportunities arise. I look forward
to working with the new Mayor and setting out on new challenges for our city.
Wednesday, May 13, 2015
Election
While everyone in Arlington was going to the polls to vote on Mayor, Council, School Board and Prop 1, I was lucky enough to be removed from the process by attending my son’s wedding in Cabo. I was surprised by some of the results, especially in the school board races. I was not surprised by the Mayor and Prop 1 results.
School Board races gave me pause because this current School Board was voted Number 1 in the state, and the one race that kept Aaron Reich was within 1% of losing. Peter Baron was in the same situation with a losing result. I find this unwarranted due to the performance of the School Board over the last few years. I feel that these are good people doing a thankless job, to create a positive learning environment for our children. We will see what results can be achieved.
The Mayoral race I saw before leaving was a very close contest. Jeff ran a very good campaign and was simply rewarded with this victory. I spent yesterday with the Mayor at our Council meeting and he seems to be taking the defeat very positively, and in good spirits. It may have been time for a change and some fresh ideas, but Mayor Cluck’s body of work over the past 16 yrs. has been remarkable and good for the city. He can be proud of the accomplishments that he and past Councils have achieved with a good conscience. Isn’t that what we all strive to do in our lives?
Concerning the Red Light Cameras, the people have spoken, and my hands are clean. I have tried to educate the citizens on what will happen and we will see if accidents increase like in other cities. I have every confidence that the RLC company will sue the city and that the election will be ruled illegal, just as it has been in the other six cities in Texas. I can only hope that your loved ones will not be injured in the future, because of this poor decision by the voters.
Concerning my son’s wedding, it was beautiful. The groom was handsome, the bride was beautiful, the setting was remarkable, and I caught a 150 lb. striped marlin. This event was successful in removing me from the political process and enjoying the time with my family. I am blessed.
Monday, April 27, 2015
Vote No on Prop 1 and Keep the Cameras
I will leave this post up until after the election is over. 4/28/15 the only significant item on the Council's plate was the tax abatement for General Motors 80% off for 10 yrs. They are very happy with those numbers.
A letter in support of RLC's by the Chairmen of the National Safety Coalition. We have an opportunity to keep our intersections safe. Early voting starts today.
A letter in support of RLC's by the Chairmen of the National Safety Coalition. We have an opportunity to keep our intersections safe. Early voting starts today.
Dear Legislator X
We write to express our support for continuing Texas’ red
light camera programs and urge you to vote against [BILL #] at the [NAME]
committee on [DAY], [DATE]. Texas communities use traffic safety cameras to
reduce red light running, reduce crashes and save lives, and these programs
have had enormous success. However, [BILL NUMBER] seeks to ban, limit or place restrictions
on the use of red light cameras and put the public’s safety at risk. This would drastically reduce the
ability of our Texas police departments to enforce and hold accountable drivers
who run red lights.
Law enforcement officials understand the dangers
affecting their communities, particularly the dangers we face on our
roadways. Local police departments know
the needs of their communities and understand the need for the added
enforcement on our roadways. We believe they should have every available technology
at their disposal to enforce the crucial traffic safety laws that keep us safe
and hold red light runners accountable.
The data is indisputable that Texas’s red light camera
programs have successfully changed driver behavior and reduced red light
running, crashes and injuries on our state’s roads. The most recent statistics from police
departments show traffic safety cameras have reduced crashes at the state’s
most dangerous intersections:
- Ft. Worth: 83% reduction in the number of collisions after one year of installing safety cameras (Star-Telegram, 2/1/15)
- Arlington: 75% reduction in the number of collisions at photo-enforced intersections (The Shorthorn, 2/11/15)
- Sugar Land: 59% reduction in the number of intersection crashes at photo-enforced intersections (City of Sugar Land, 2012).
- Plano: 50% reduction in rear-end collisions, 43% in intersection collisions, and 20% in red light running collisions at photo-enforced intersections (City of Plano, 2013)
- Killeen: 47% reduction in red-light violations (Killeen Daily Herald, 8/3/2014)
- Austin: 40% reduction in the number of collisions at photo-enforced intersections (Austin American-Statesman, 3/5/12).
We are concerned if the
red light camera programs do not continue we could see dramatic
increases in red light running and crashes, as has happened in other
communities:
- Houston: The Houston Police Department reported a 117% increase in collisions – from 4,100 to almost 9,000 – and a 30% increase in fatal crashes since safety cameras were turned off in 2010 (ABC 13, 10/28/14). Injury crashes increased by 350% and one dangerous intersection saw crashes increase by 1,300% (KTRK-13, 6/8/11).
- Albuquerque, New Mexico: 584% increase in speeding and red light running five months after cameras were turned off (KRQE, 5/27/11).
- Garfield Heights, Ohio: 214% increase in speeding after safety cameras were turned off (City of Garfield Heights, 2011)
Even more, many Texas police departments face resource
challenges. Red light cameras have served as force multipliers, allowing them
to address other public safety needs without having to sacrifice the
enforcement of our most basic traffic safety laws. Local police officers have utilized safety
cameras to make roads safer for all of us, and they have worked. If
municipalities had not had the right to determine what is best for their roads,
who knows how many more accidents would have occurred? Unfortunately, for
many families, it is already too late.
Photo enforcement keeps our roads and residents safe, but we
need your help to make sure these traffic safety camera programs continue to be
successful. In the next ten hours, at least one person will be killed on our Texas
roadways. We cannot wait for more
innocent bystanders to be killed while we allow more drivers to ignore our most
basic traffic safety law – red means stop.
We urge you to oppose any effort to ban or limit the use of traffic
safety cameras.
Sincerely
Paul and Sue Oberhauser
National Co-Chairs, Traffic Safety Coalition
Saturday, April 18, 2015
April 14 Council Meeting
I’m sorry I did not post after the Council meeting on the 14th,
but I left town very early the next morning.
There were two items of interest on the agenda. The first was the issue terminating the
agreement with the developer on the Sapphire Project. That was a student housing project on Center
St. and Hosak. This project was approved
two years ago and never got off the ground due to lack of funding. The city paid the developer to demo some
ghetto apartments that were on the land in question, but funds were never
available to start construction. In the
last moments the developer produced a financier to start the project, but it
was too little too late. The Council
voted 9-0 to cancel the agreement. I was
never in favor of this project because it allowed 172 students per acre. I stated at the time that I would not allow
172 dogs in an acre of land much less students.
I was the only no vote as I recall.
The second item was the request by the Athos Academy (Bardin
& Bowen Rds) to increase their student count from 1206 to 1416. The residents were concerned because of the
increase in traffic. I spent 4.5 hrs.
watching traffic from 7-8:30 and 3-4:30 on three separate occasions. I took this issue seriously and came away
with the fact that after each green light interval the traffic queues were
empty. I drove the area and found that
travel was manageable and acceptable. So
traffic was not the issue for me. The
issue was trustworthiness. You see the
school had an agreement with the city to operate at 1206 students. They didn’t honor that agreement for one
day. They opened the school with over
1300 students. At the time of their
request they were operating in the 1390 range of students. So residents were not telling the truth about
the traffic and school management didn’t uphold the agreement with the
city. What finally blew me off the fence
was a letter from the school’s attorney stating that they were in full
compliance with state statutes and only had to comply with certain numbers of teacher
to student levels. The ratios were K-8th
grade 1 teacher for 28 students and 9th-12th grade 1
teacher for 34 students. Now the school employs
78 teachers so if you do the math, the school could go to over 2300 students
according to their lawyer and be within the guidelines of the Commissioner of
Education’s rules for Charter schools. In defense of the school, they stated that
they would bus any number over 1200 students in an effort to ease traffic
concerns. But since I could not trust
them to comply with the 1206 number, I certainly couldn’t trust them to
maintain their word concerning the proper number of students to bus. That is the reason that I voted no on this
issue. The issue was denied 5-4. When asked how they could regain my trust in
the future, I simply stated that they should operate within the confines of the
original agreement with the city and readdress it as we see what the impact it is
on the community.
Of note also, there was a Reinvestment Zone established for
General Motors. The reason for the RZ is
to establish an abatement, should General Motors decide to make an investment
of $1.2 billion in the Arlington Plant.
I believe that this abatement will be approved at the next Council
meeting, setting the table for GM’s decision.
Saturday, April 4, 2015
Town Hall Meeting
I will be holding a Town Hall meeting on the 23rd
of April at Shackelford Jr. High. It
will be an update on the projects that are going in mostly in North
Arlington. I will also discuss the
library and 100 Center street project.
Topics to be covered:
Arlington Commons, I30/360 Interchange, Ditto Golf Course,
TXDOT Property, Viridian update, Aloft Hotel, Convention Hotel, General Motors
update, Roquemore and Eddie & Debbie Peach Elementary Schools/Boys &
Girls Club, Library, Champion's Park, 100 Center St. and the MGM Grand hotel. If I have left anything out your questions
will surely cover it.
I hope to see a good turnout as we usually do. I will start the power point presentation
promptly at 7:00. And as always I look forward to an
active question and answer period.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


